Skip to main content

So I thought I should do some research

16.9.17

Don’t worry. I have been doing research before. But I haven’t really done research in order to say something in particular. The research has been building up different experiences of masculinity. So it’s been talking to lots of different people.
So I spoke to a lot of male friends. I have wanted to avoid making this too narrow a project- I don’t want it to be overly male. But I suspect that the female experience of hypermasculinity is likely to be one of toxic, or even aggressive masculinity. Not that these experiences are in any less valid. More that I want to understand what the men are thinking when they perform their gender, rather than the reactions from the audience for that performance. So I have focussed my research mostly with men.
I would, of course, like to speak to some non-binary people and trans people, but need to be careful to avoid making the conversation something of a ‘curiosity’ event. Which is something writers can easily find themselves doing. ‘Hello. I’m writing a play about gender. Would you mind please giving me some easily consumable information about your gender?’. I don’t feel that’s very appropriate. I need to work out how to phrase my questions better first.
So I’m doing some research. Something I touched on before to do with Elvis’ cultural ‘mixing’ seems to be a significant factor in gender conceptions. But the research shows that I was wrong. The Columbia Business School’s study, entitled ‘Gender and Race: How Overlapping Stereotypes Affect Interracial Dating, Leadership Selection, and Athletic Participation’, addressed the idea of gendered race. The study showed that, in America, black men are seen as the most masculine, followed by white men, and last, Asian men. (I’m not sure about the study’s decision to lump all races into three groups- but that’s a whole other topic. I’m not disagreeing; I’m just not sure). Furthermore, men find Asian women the most attractive (because being Asian is associated with femininity, and men find femininity attractive). Equally, women find black men more attractive: and these results are born out in the 2000 US Census: of all black-white marriages, 73% were black man/ white women. Correlatively, of all Asian-white marriages, 75 % were white man, Asian woman.
So my idea that ‘Elvis’ mixing cultures of might lead to a different conception of masculinity’ was along the right lines. I just got the conclusion wrong. If this study is correct, I should have found him more masculine through his plagiarism of black identity. So I was wrong on that front.
So gender and race are connected. Obviously not inherently, but Americans see race as having an effect on the perpetuation of gender.
I don’t feel like drawing any particular conclusions from this study because first, I feel like having a ‘type’ based on race is tacitly offensive. If I were to say ‘I only find Spanish women attractive, it would I think non-Spanish women are unattractive.
But also, I feel the study is a bit simplistic. It only really speaks of three types of man and woman: this ignores mixed race people; I’m unclear about the three categories of race chosen; the study doesn’t explain much of what is meant by ‘more’ or ‘less’ masculine or feminine. It doesn’t really explore the actual genders it talks about. Though I suppose the take away point is that gender is more complicated than we thought.
Well, gosh


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Guest 2. Eleanor Paisley

17.2.18 Eleanor Paisley moved to London in September 2016 London is many things to many people: formidable, dirty, modern, exciting, full of opportunity. For me, London represented a step towards the life I wanted to have: being at the centre of everything in a multicultural society. As a student, I did feel as if I was in another world. It didn’t feel like I was in England at all. I would regularly socialise with fewer English people than otherwise – which suited me just fine. In university as well as all over London, the word ‘metropolitan’ applies perfectly. However, the adjective that I would most use when describing my time in London is ‘lonely’. In a sea of people, running from A to C to B then back to A again on the tube, buses, bikes, taxis, cars and trains, you become totally anonymous. Despite walking every day from Southwark to Strand, I rarely got to see much greenery. The air is alive with the business of the people, and only myself and a handful of my cohorts dared ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Guest 1. Mania Lewandowska

14/2/18. Mania Lewandowska I moved to London in (a) September. They had organised a farewell party for me, where my brother said: “ I remember when you were three and you would scream your lungs out every time you saw a fly. And now you ’ re going to uni. I can ’ t believe it. ” I couldn ’ t really believe it either. A week later, on the first day of Freshers ’ , I twisted my ankle running through Camden to catch a bus, and spent five hours in the accident and emergency waiting room of UCLH, dozing off with my head resting on my mum ’ s shoulder. She was supposed to fly back the next day, and I was supposed to stay, mature and independent, on my own. They told me the leg wasn ’ t broken and gave me a pair of wobbly crutches; it was 3a.m. as I hopped back to my dorm along Euston Road. It was the first time that I realised that traffic was a constant thing in London, happening not only in rush hour, but absolutely always. You could be stuck in a senseless jam at 4 at night ...
Post a Comment
Read more

So I thought I should say, that I'm only sayin..

12.9.17 So I want to follow on from my *highly* controversial blog about Elvis, mixed in with a little Daily Show and the ethics of blog-writing. So: Elvis. I argued that Elvis’ appropriation of black music and style meant that I didn’t really understand his masculinity. I argued that my understanding of masculinity was different from his because he mixed cultures and warped the pattern of masculinity I’m used to. My understanding of masculinity is obviously 50 odd years later than his, and there has obviously been change and (d)evolution. I focussed on ethnicity/culture as a key part of that transformation, but maybe this hasnt changed. How many prominent male black actors have been chosen to play the good guy in the last ten years in any Hollywood film? (Note- this is rhetorical: of course there have been- John Boyega in Star Wars and Detroit, Will Smith in anything, Morgan Freeman in anything. But when did Samuel Jackson play the nice guy?) How many black men have been chose...
Post a Comment
Read more